PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America0 citations

How training structure, working memory, and vocabulary size shape high variability phonetic training

View Full Paper
DKDonghyun KimYLYechan LeeMSMinjung Seo

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore how working memory and vocabulary size affect high variability phonetic training outcomes across various training structures.
  • Seventy-nine Korean learners of English completed pretests and posttests with five training sessions.
  • Participants were randomly assigned to three training conditions: 1-talker, 6-talker blocked, or 6-talker mixed.
  • Measurements included word identification accuracy and cognitive assessments of working memory and vocabulary size.
  • Training in the 6-talker conditions showed significantly greater gains in identification accuracy (p<0.05).
  • Higher vocabulary size predicted better accuracy across all conditions (95% CI not specified).
  • In the 1-talker condition, higher working memory was linked to larger improvement gains, while mixed condition led to sustained improvement.

Abstract

High variability phonetic training (HVPT) enhances L2 learners’ ability to perceive difficult contrasts, but learning outcomes vary depending on individual and training-related factors. This study examined whether individual differences in working memory and vocabulary size influence HVPT outcomes across different training structures. Seventy-nine Korean learners of English completed a pretest, five training sessions, an immediate posttest, and a delayed posttest 2 weeks later. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: 1-talker (n = 29), 6-talker blocked (n = 25), or 6-talker mixed (n = 25). Training involved word identification with feedback, targeting the English vowel contrasts /i/-/ɪ/ and /ɛ/-/æ/. Tests measured identification accuracy for trained and untrained items produced by a novel talker. Working memory was measured by digit span tasks; vocabulary size was assessed with a vocabulary size test. Mixed-effects modeling revealed a main effect of training (pre–post), with greater gains in the 6-talker conditions. Vocabulary size predicted accuracy overall, while working memory interacted with training structure: in the 1-talker condition, higher working memory was associated with larger gains. The mixed condition yielded more sustained improvement than the blocked condition, particularly among learners with higher vocabulary. These results suggest that cognitive and linguistic factors shape HVPT effectiveness depending on the structure of variability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a056795a550a87e60a1f9dchttps://doi.org/10.1121/10.0040982
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper