PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America0 citations

Cross-linguistic transfer in lexical stress perception: A cue-weighting typology

View Full Paper
ATAnnie C. TremblayMBMirjam BroersmaTCTaehong Cho

Key Points

  • The study examines how L2 listeners from diverse L1 backgrounds perceive English lexical stress and the influence of their native language cues.
  • Participants from English, Dutch, Mandarin, Spanish, and Korean backgrounds completed a cue-weighting perception task.
  • Vowel quality, pitch, and duration cues were tested with orthogonal manipulation of acoustic dimensions.
  • Bayesian mixed-effects models analyzed cue effects and L2 proficiency.
  • For vowel quality, English > Mandarin > Dutch > Korean > Spanish (exact values not provided).
  • For pitch, Mandarin > Korean, Dutch > Spanish > English (exact values not provided).
  • For duration, English, Mandarin, Dutch > Spanish > Korean (exact values not provided).

Abstract

This study investigates how second-language (L2) listeners from five first-language (L1) backgrounds—English, Dutch, Mandarin, Spanish, and Korean—perceive English lexical stress, focusing on their use of vowel quality, pitch, and duration cues. Participants completed a cue-weighting perception task (Tremblay et al., 2021) in which two acoustic dimensions were manipulated orthogonally while the third was neutralized. Data for Dutch listeners come from the original study. Predictions about cross-linguistic transfer were based on the functional weight of each cue in the L1. The following L1 effects were predicted: For vowel quality: English, Mandarin Dutch Spanish, Korean; for pitch: Mandarin Korean Dutch, Spanish English; for duration: English, Mandarin Dutch, Spanish Korean. Bayesian mixed-effects models tested the effects of cues and L1 with L2 proficiency (Lemhöfer Mandarin Dutch Korean Spanish; for pitch: Mandarin Korean, Dutch Spanish English; for duration: English, Mandarin, Dutch Spanish Korean. These findings support a cue-weighting typology shaped by L1-specific cue prominence, with implications for theories of transfer and perceptual learning in L2 acquisition.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tremblay et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0567a8a550a87e60a1fc90https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0041340
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Towards an attentional theory of second-language speech perception: Evidence from cue ecology2026
  2. 2The interaction of auditory acuity and L2 input in suprasegmental cue-weighting shifts after study abroad: Mandarin speakers’ perception of Spanish lexical stress2026
  3. 3Cross-linguistic effects of Korean experience on Chinese listeners’ perception of English lexical stress2025
  4. 4Perceptual Plasticity in Bilinguals: Language Dominance Reshapes Acoustic Cue Weightings2025
  5. 5Hearing Tones, Missing Boundaries: Cross-Level Selective Transfer of Prosodic Boundaries Among Chinese–English Learners2025