PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2001American Journal of Epidemiology196 citations

Dementia and Disability Outcomes in Large Hypertension Trials: Lessons Learned from the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) Trial

View Full Paper
MBMauro Di BariMPMarco PahorLFLonneke V. Franse

Key Points

  • This study aims to determine if cognitive and functional outcome assessments were biased due to differential dropout rates in the SHEP trial.
  • Compared characteristics of subjects who participated in follow-up evaluations and those who did not.

Structured PICO

Does active antihypertensive treatment reduce incident cognitive impairment and disability in older hypertensive adults?

P
Population
Older hypertensive adults from the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) trial
I
Intervention
Active antihypertensive treatment
C
Comparator
Placebo
O
Outcome
Incident cognitive impairment and disabilitypatient reported

Differential dropout in the SHEP trial likely biased cognitive and functional outcomes toward the null, obscuring the protective effect of antihypertensive therapy against cognitive and functional decline.

Abstract

In the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) trial (1985-1990), active treatment reduced the incidence of cardiovascular events, but not that of dementia and disability, as compared with placebo. This study aims to evaluate if assessment of cognitive and functional outcomes was biased by differential dropout. Characteristics of subjects who did or did not participate in follow-up cognitive and functional evaluations were compared. The relative risks of incident cognitive impairment and disability were assessed in the two treatment groups, with the use of the reported findings and under the assumption that the proportions of cognitive and functional impairment among dropouts increased. Assignment to the placebo group and the occurrence of cardiovascular events independently predicted missed assessments. From the reported findings, the risk of cognitive and functional impairment was similar between the two treatment groups. However, when 20-30% and 40-80% of the subjects who missed the assessment were assumed to be cognitively and, respectively, functionally impaired, assignment to active treatment reduced the risk of these outcomes. In the SHEP, the cognitive and functional evaluations were biased toward the null effect by differential dropout. This might have obscured the appraisal of a protective effect of treatment on the cognitive and functional decline of older hypertensive adults.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bari et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a066683466d45c54c025301https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/153.1.72
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper