PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1990IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing354 citations

Evaluation Of The Grey-level Co-occurrence Matrix Method For Land-cover Classification Using Spot Imagery

View Full Paper
DMDanielle J. MarceauPHPhilip J. HowarthJDJ -M Dubois

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the grey-level co-occurrence matrix method for classifying land-cover types using SPOT imagery.
  • Nine cover types were classified using a textural/spectral approach.
  • Supervised classification applied maximum-likelihood algorithm to multispectral bands combined with texture images.
  • Classification accuracy was measured using Kappa coefficients from confusion matrices.
  • Texture features significantly improved classification accuracy compared to multispectral analysis alone.
  • Window size explained 90% of classification variability, while texture measures contributed 7% and quantization level 3%.
  • An optimal window size was identified for discriminating each cover type.

Abstract

Absfruct-Nine cover types have been classified using a textural/ spectral approach. The texture analysis is based on the grey-level cooccurrence matrix method. Texture features are created from a SPOT near-infrared image using four texture indices, seven window sizes, and two quantization levels. A supervised classification based on the maximum-likelihood algorithm is applied to the three SPOT multispectral bands combined with each texture image individually and to the three bands combined with all four texture images. Classification accuracy is measured by Kappa coefficients calculated from confusion matrices. A factor analysis, based on principal components, is performed to evaluate the contribution to the classification accuracy of each variable involved in the creation of the texture features. The addition of texture features provides a significant improvement in the classification accuracy of each cover type when compared with the results obtained from the multispectral analysis alone. The window size accounts for 90% of the classification variability, 7% is explained by the statistics used as texture measures, and only 3% by the quantization level. There is a window size that optimizes the discrimination of each cover type.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marceau et al. (1990) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06756eb15c5606f288c419https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.1990.572937
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper