Artificial intelligence in the perioperative management of major gastrointestinal surgeries shows potential for accurate risk assessment and automated care, though it currently relies on human analysis.
How can artificial intelligence be applied in the perioperative management of major gastrointestinal surgeries?
Artificial intelligence has the potential to revolutionize perioperative care in major gastrointestinal surgeries by improving risk assessment, intraoperative management, and outcome prediction.
Artificial intelligence (AI) demonstrated by machines is based on reinforcement learning and revolves around the usage of algorithms. The purpose of this review was to summarize concepts, the scope, applications, and limitations in major gastrointestinal surgery. This is a narrative review of the available literature on the key capabilities of AI to help anesthesiologists, surgeons, and other physicians to understand and critically evaluate ongoing and new AI applications in perioperative management. AI uses available databases called "big data" to formulate an algorithm. Analysis of other data based on these algorithms can help in early diagnosis, accurate risk assessment, intraoperative management, automated drug delivery, predicting anesthesia and surgical complications and postoperative outcomes and can thus lead to effective perioperative management as well as to reduce the cost of treatment. Perioperative physicians, anesthesiologists, and surgeons are well-positioned to help integrate AI into modern surgical practice. We all need to partner and collaborate with data scientists to collect and analyze data across all phases of perioperative care to provide clinical scenarios and context. Careful implementation and use of AI along with real-time human interpretation will revolutionize perioperative care, and is the way forward in future perioperative management of major surgery.
Solanki et al. (Wed,) conducted a review in Major gastrointestinal surgeries. Artificial intelligence was evaluated. Artificial intelligence in the perioperative management of major gastrointestinal surgeries shows potential for accurate risk assessment and automated care, though it currently relies on human analysis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: