Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Haemolysis is usually caused by inadequate specimen collection or preanalytical handling, and is suggested to be a suitable indicator of pre-analytical quality. We investigated the prevalence of detectable haemolysis in all routine venous blood samples to identify differences in preanalytical quality. METHODS: Haemolysis index (HI) values were obtained from a Vitros 5,1 in the routine clinical chemistry laboratory for samples collected in primary health care centres (PHCs), nursing homes, and a hospital emergency department (ED). Haemolysis was defined as a HI > or =15 (detection limit). RESULTS: Samples from the PHC with the highest prevalence of haemolysis were 6.1 times (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0-9.2) more often haemolysed compared to the centre with the lowest prevalence. Of the samples collected in primary health care, 10.4% were haemolysed compared to 31.1% in the ED (p<0.001). A notable difference in haemolysed samples was found between the ED section staffed by emergency medicine physicians and the section staffed by primary health care physicians (34.8% vs. 11.3%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The significant variation in haemolysis indices among the investigated units is likely to reflect varying preanalytical conditions. The HI is a valuable tool for estimation and follow-up of preanalytical quality in primary health care.
Söderberg et al. (Thu,) studied this question.