Radiofrequency ablation within the coronary sinus carries a potential lethal risk of acute coronary artery occlusion, leading to aborted sudden cardiac death and malignant ventricular arrhythmias.
Case Report (n=1)
Radiofrequency ablation within the coronary sinus carries a potential lethal risk of acute coronary artery occlusion leading to sudden cardiac death and malignant ventricular arrhythmias.
Aborted Cardiac Death After Ablation of Coronary Sinus We report a case of aborted sudden cardiac death and subsequent development of malignant drug‐refractory incessant ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation in a patient with acute coronary artery occlusion following radiofrequency ablation within the CS. Catheter ablation is a well‐established therapy for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). In patients with longstanding persistent AF extensive left atrial ablation and ablation inside the coronary sinus (CS) is frequently performed. Perimitral flutter following AF ablation is the most common form of left atrial macroreentry, especially in patients with previous ablation of complex fractionated electrograms and incomplete linear lesion sets within the left atrium. Successful ablation of this type of tachycardia is generally difficult and in about 60–70% patients requires additional ablation within the CS to achieve termination of tachycardia or/and left atrial isthmus (LAI) block. A limited number of case reports have been published describing acute coronary artery occlusion during or immediately after LAI ablation within the CS. This case exhibits a potential lethal risk of radiofrequency ablation within the CS.
Makimoto et al. (Tue,) conducted a case report in Aborted sudden cardiac death and malignant ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (n=1). Radiofrequency ablation within the coronary sinus was evaluated. Radiofrequency ablation within the coronary sinus carries a potential lethal risk of acute coronary artery occlusion, leading to aborted sudden cardiac death and malignant ventricular arrhythmias.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: