PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Photonics1 citationsOpen Access

Photobiomodulation Therapy and Central Nervous System Disorders: A Systematic Review of Delivery Routes, Mechanisms, Parameters and Clinical Evidence

View Full Paper
MCMark CronshawSPSteven ParkerELEdward Lynch

Key Points

  • This review aims to synthesize evidence on photobiomodulation therapy's effectiveness across various central nervous system disorders.
  • Conducted a systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines across five databases until January 2025.
  • Included studies utilized PBM in treating CNS conditions with quantified neurological or cognitive outcomes.
  • Quality of evidence was assessed with RoB 2, ROBINS-I, SYRCLE, and GRADE frameworks.
  • 30 studies met inclusion criteria: 27 human studies involving approximately 2244 participants and 3 animal studies.
  • Irradiance and light source significantly influenced efficacy, particularly for Alzheimer’s disease (GRADE: Moderate).
  • Trans-cranial LED showed low-grade promise for Parkinson’s disease; 808 nm laser demonstrated no benefit for acute ischaemic stroke (GRADE: High).

Abstract

Photobiomodulation (PBM), the therapeutic application of red to near-infrared light, has demonstrated neuroprotective effects in preclinical CNS models, yet clinical translation remains inconsistent. This systematic review synthesises evidence for PBM across CNS applications to identify factors associated with therapeutic response. We searched five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus) through January 2025 following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Included studies employed PBM for CNS conditions with quantified neurological, cognitive, or functional outcomes; evidence quality was assessed using RoB 2, ROBINS-I, SYRCLE, and the GRADE framework. Thirty studies met inclusion criteria: 27 human studies (n ≈ 2244 participants) and 3 animal studies spanning Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, stroke, traumatic brain injury, and other CNS conditions. Dosimetry—particularly irradiance and light source type (laser vs. LED)—appears to be the primary factor associated with efficacy for Alzheimer’s disease (GRADE: Moderate); trans-cranial LED shows promise for Parkinson’s disease (GRADE: Low); trans-cranial 808 nm laser demonstrates no benefit for acute ischaemic stroke (GRADE: High). Systemic abscopal mechanisms may offer additional therapeutic pathways warranting investigation. These findings provide a condition-specific framework for rational PBM protocol development, supporting adequate irradiance via laser or intra-nasal delivery for Alzheimer’s disease, LED-based trans-cranial protocols for Parkinson’s disease, and integration of artificial intelligence for personalised optimisation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cronshaw et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095b8e7880e6d24efe168fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/photonics13050488
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper