PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 4, 201925 citationsOpen Access

From 'F' to 'A' on the N.Y. Regents Science Exams: An Overview of the Aristo Project

PCPeter E. ClarkOEOren EtzioniDKDaniel Khashabi

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

AI has achieved remarkable mastery over games such as Chess, Go, and Poker, and even Jeopardy, but the rich variety of standardized exams has remained a landmark challenge. Even in 2016, the best AI system achieved merely 59.3% on an 8th Grade science exam challenge. This paper reports unprecedented success on the Grade 8 New York Regents Science Exam, where for the first time a system scores more than 90% on the exam's non-diagram, multiple choice (NDMC) questions. In addition, our Aristo system, building upon the success of recent language models, exceeded 83% on the corresponding Grade 12 Science Exam NDMC questions. The results, on unseen test questions, are robust across different test years and different variations of this kind of test. They demonstrate that modern NLP methods can result in mastery on this task. While not a full solution to general question-answering (the questions are multiple choice, and the domain is restricted to 8th Grade science), it represents a significant milestone for the field.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Clark et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a096e1559b902245b45c1e5https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1909.01958
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Project Halo: Towards a Digital Aristotle2004 · 87 citations
  2. 2Computing Lexical Contrast2012 · 102 citations
  3. 3Building Watson: An Overview of the DeepQA Project2010 · 1,523 citations
  4. 4Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine Comprehension2016 · 1,295 citations
  5. 5Readings in Knowledge Representation1985 · 1,030 citations