PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1963European Journal of Sociology146 citations

Resistance to the Systematic Study of Multiple Discoveries in Science

View Full Paper
RMRobert Κ. Merton

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The pages of the history of science record thousands of instances of similar discoveries having been made by scientists working independently of one another. Sometimes the discoveries are simultaneous or almost so; sometimes a scientist will make anew a discovery which, unknown to him, somebody else had made years before. Such occurrences suggest that discoveries become virtually inevitable when prerequisite kinds of knowledge and tools accumulate in man's cultural store and when the attention of an appreciable number of investigators becomes focussed on a problem, by emerging social needs, by developments internal to the science, or by both. Since at least 1917, when the anthropologist A. L. Kroeber published his influential paper dealing in part with the subject (I) and especially since 1922, when the sociologists William F. Ogburn and Dorothy S. Thomas compiled a list of some 150 cases of multiple independent discoveries and inventions (2), this hypothesis has become firmly established in sociological thought.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Robert Κ. Merton (1963) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0a324aa9b588564434d66fhttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0003975600000801
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper