PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2015Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging142 citationsOpen Access

Effect of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction on Postoperative Outcome in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement

View Full Paper
JDJordi Sanchez DahlMEMackram F. EleidHMHéctor I. Michelena

Key Result

Preoperative LVEF was independently predictive of mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement (HR 0.88 per 10% increase; P<0.001).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=2,017)

Structured PICO

Does preoperative LVEF predict long-term mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement?

P
Population
2,017 symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area <1 cm2, mean gradient ≥40 mm Hg, or indexed aortic valve area <0.6 cm2/m2) who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement
I
Intervention
Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <60% (specifically <50% and 50-59%)
C
Comparator
Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥60%
O
Outcome
Long-term mortalityhard clinical

In patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement, a preoperative LVEF of 50-59% is associated with significantly higher long-term mortality compared to an LVEF ≥60%, challenging the traditional guideline threshold of <50% for intervention.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 0.88

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

Background— In asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis, guidelines recommend left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of <50% as the threshold for referral for aortic valve replacement. We investigated the importance of LVEF on long-term outcome after aortic valve replacement in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis. Methods and Results— We retrospectively identified 2017 patients with severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area<1 cm 2 , mean gradient≥40 mm Hg, or indexed aortic valve area<0.6 cm 2 /m 2 ) who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement from January 1995 to June 2009. Patients were divided into 4 groups depending on preoperative LVEF (<50% in 300 15% patients, 50%–59% in 331 17%, 60%–69% in 908 45%, and ≥70% in 478 24%). During follow-up of 5.3±4.4 years, 1056 (52%) patients died. A decrease in mortality was observed with increasing LVEF, P <0.0001; 5-year mortality estimates (95% confidence interval) were 0.41 (0.35–0.47), LVEF<50%; 0.35 (0.29–0.41), LVEF 50% to 59%; 0.26 (0.23–0.29), LVEF 60% to 69%; and 0.22 (0.18–0.26), LVEF≥70%. Compared with patients with LVEF≥60%, patients with LVEF 50% to 59% had increased mortality (hazard ratio HR, 1.58; P <0.001), with similar risk increase in both symptomatic (HR, 1.56; P <0.001) and asymptomatic patients (HR, 1.58; P =0.006). Correcting for risk factors, LV mass index, aortic valve area, and stroke volume index, LVEF was independently predictive of mortality (HR, 0.88 per 10%; P <0.001). When this analysis was repeated in the subset of 1333 patients without history of coronary artery disease, LVEF remained associated with mortality (HR, 0.90 per 10%; P =0.009). Conclusions— LVEF is a powerful predictor of outcome in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement, independent of the presence of valve-related symptoms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dahl et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis (n=2,017). Preoperative LVEF was evaluated on Mortality (HR 0.88, p=<0.001). Preoperative LVEF was independently predictive of mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement (HR 0.88 per 10% increase; P<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0a593997b2cd65685918a7https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.114.002917
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper