PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1978Circulation115 citationsOpen Access

Detection of tricuspid regurgitation with two-dimensional echocardiography and peripheral vein injections.

View Full Paper
WLWilliam M. LieppeVBVictor S. BeharRSRalph Scallion

Structured PICO

Does contrast echocardiography with peripheral venous injections accurately detect tricuspid regurgitation compared to clinical findings?

P
Population
30 patients, including 5 with diagnostic clinical findings for tricuspid regurgitation, 15 with equivocal findings or associated conditions, and 10 controls.
I
Intervention
Contrast echocardiography utilizing a two-dimensional ultrasound system and peripheral venous injections
C
Comparator
Clinical and angiographic data
O
Outcome
Detection of tricuspid regurgitation (appearance of contrast in the inferior vena cava and back and forth movement of contrast across the tricuspid valve)surrogate

Two-dimensional contrast echocardiography with peripheral venous injections is a specific and potentially highly sensitive method for detecting tricuspid regurgitation.

Abstract

"Contrast echocardiography", utilizing a two-dimensional ultrasound system and peripheral venous injections, was used for the detection of tricuspid regurgitation in 30 patients. The appearance of contrast in the inferior vena cava and the back and forth movement of contrast across the tricuspid valve were considered evidence for tricuspid regurgitation. Echocardiographic findings were correlated with clinical and angiographic data. Patients were assigned on the basis of clinical data to one of three groups. Group I included five patients whose clinical findings were diagnostic for tricuspid regurgitation. Group II included patients (15) whose clinical findings were equivocal for tricuspid regurgitation and patients whose recognized primary problem is frequently associated with tricuspid regurgitation. Group III contained ten patients serving as controls. All group I patients had positive echocardiographic studies for tricuspid regurgitation, while all group III patients had negative studies, suggesting that this technique may be specific for tricuspid regurgitation. Among the group II patients were three who had positive echocardiographic studies despite the absence of specific clinical findings of tricuspid regurgitation, suggesting that this technique may be more sensitive than the methods in common use.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lieppe et al. (1978) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ccd77a4d785ea81625b84https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.57.1.128
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Detection of tricuspid regurgitation by contrast echocardiography.1982 · 9 citations
  2. 2Evaluation of tricuspid regurgitation by pulsed Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiography.1982 · 229 citations
  3. 3Preliminary experience with reversal of venoatrial flow in the diagnosis of tricuspid regurgitation1981 · 1 citations
  4. 4Tricuspid Regurgitation1989 · 2 citations
  5. 5The Clinical Spectrum of Tricuspid Regurgitation Detected by Pulsed Doppler Echocardiography1985 · 6 citations