Canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg reduced systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure, and double product compared to placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Does canagliflozin improve blood pressure and markers of arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Canagliflozin significantly reduces blood pressure and markers of arterial stiffness (pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure, and double product) in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Absolute Event Rate: -5% vs -0.3%
BACKGROUND: Physiologic determinants, such as pulse pressure difference between systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP), mean arterial pressure (2/3 DBP + 1/3 SBP), and double product beats per minute (bpm) × SBP, are linked to cardiovascular outcomes. The effects of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, on pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure, and double product were assessed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: This post hoc analysis was based on pooled data from four 26-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies evaluating canagliflozin in patients with T2DM (N = 2313) and a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) study evaluating canagliflozin in patients with T2DM and hypertension (N = 169). Changes from baseline in SBP, DBP, pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure, and double product were assessed using seated BP measurements (pooled studies) or averaged 24-h BP assessments (ABPM study). Safety was assessed based on adverse event reports. RESULTS: In the pooled studies, canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg reduced SBP (-4.3 and -5.0 vs -0.3 mmHg) and DBP (-2.5 and -2.4 vs -0.6 mmHg) versus placebo at week 26. Reductions in pulse pressure (-1.8 and -2.6 vs 0.2 mmHg), mean arterial pressure (-3.1 and -3.3 vs -0.5 mmHg), and double product (-381 and -416 vs -30 bpm × mmHg) were also seen with canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg versus placebo. In the ABPM study, canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg reduced mean 24-h SBP (-4.5 and -6.2 vs -1.2 mmHg) and DBP (-2.2 and -3.2 vs -0.3 mmHg) versus placebo at week 6. Canagliflozin 300 mg provided reductions in pulse pressure (-3.3 vs -0.8 mmHg) and mean arterial pressure (-4.2 vs -0.6 mmHg) compared with placebo, while canagliflozin 100 mg had more modest effects on these parameters. Canagliflozin was generally well tolerated in both study populations. CONCLUSIONS: Canagliflozin improved all three cardiovascular physiologic markers, consistent with the hypothesis that canagliflozin may have beneficial effects on some cardiovascular outcomes in patients with T2DM. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01081834 (registered March 2010); NCT01106677 (registered April 2010); NCT01106625 (registered April 2010); NCT01106690 (registered April 2010); NCT01939496 (registered September 2013).
Pfeifer et al. (Mon,) conducted a other in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=2,482). Canagliflozin vs. Placebo was evaluated on Change from baseline in systolic blood pressure at week 26 (canagliflozin 300 mg vs placebo). Canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg reduced systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure, and double product compared to placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: