Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Aging is accompanied by a progressive decline in immune function, known as immunosenescence, and by a chronic low-grade inflammatory state, termed inflammaging. Both conditions contribute to increased susceptibility to infections, reduced vaccine responses, and the development of age-related diseases. Emerging evidence suggests that intermittent fasting (IF), a dietary pattern that alternates between periods of fasting and feeding, may influence pathways associated with immune aging across mid-life and older adulthood. This review explores how IF may exert immunoregulatory effects through metabolic remodeling, cellular stress responses, and inflammatory signaling. Preclinical and human studies indicate that IF attenuates pro-inflammatory cytokine production, enhances autophagy, and improves immune cell function, potentially delaying immunosenescence and reducing inflammaging in middle-aged and older populations. Additionally, IF may protect against neuroinflammation and cognitive decline by reducing oxidative stress, activating AMPK-SIRT1 and ketone signaling via β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB), enhancing neuroplasticity, upregulating brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokines, inflammation, and frailty in the aging brain. However, most evidence comes from short- to medium-term studies in selected, relatively healthy populations, with benefits often similar to those of continuous calorie restriction, and there is limited data on long-term safety, adverse effects, and outcomes in frail older adults. By reducing oxidative stress and inflammaging, IF may mitigate frailty in older adults or delay its progression when initiated earlier. By integrating insights from immunometabolism and gerontology, this review highlights the potential role of IF as a non-pharmacological strategy to promote healthy immune aging and support functional outcomes in older adults. However, evidence in frail older adults remains limited, and randomized trials in this population are warranted. Future research should directly compare IF with isocaloric non-fasting regimens, include long-term follow-up, and carefully characterize safety and adherence in high-risk groups before IF can be routinely recommended for immune aging.
Alkawamleh et al. (Wed,) studied this question.