PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1984American Journal of Public Health34 citationsOpen Access

Low-sodium, high-potassium diet: feasibility and acceptability in a normotensive population.

RJRobert W. JefferyPPPhyllis L. PiriePEP J Elmer

Key Points

  • To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of two low-sodium, high-potassium dietary regimens with and without potassium chloride salt substitute in normotensive adults.
  • Enrolled 69 normotensive volunteers in an 8-week controlled dietary study.
  • Assigned participants to a control group or to one of two intervention diets targeting sodium intake below 70 mEq and potassium intake above 100 mEq, differing only by KCl salt substitute use.
  • Measured dietary compliance and urinary excretion of sodium and potassium.
  • Both dietary intervention groups achieved reduced sodium intake and increased potassium intake compared with the control group.
  • Urinary sodium excretion decreased in the intervention diet groups, while urinary potassium excretion showed no significant change.
  • Participants did not use the potassium chloride salt substitute as recommended, demonstrating poor acceptability.

Abstract

Sixty-nine normotensive volunteers participated in an eight-week study to test the feasibility and acceptability of two low-sodium (less than 70 mEq), high-potassium (greater than 100 mEq) diets. The diet groups differed only in the use of KCl salt substitute. Both dietary groups were able to reduce sodium and increase potassium intake compared to the control group. Urine sodium excretion decreased in the diet groups but no change was observed in potassium. Potassium chloride salt substitute was not used as recommended, suggesting its unacceptability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jeffery et al. (1984) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d479d1e1a6dfdb4ba70cdhttps://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.74.5.492
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper