Nuclear imaging techniques, including PET and SPECT, facilitate earlier detection and characterization of subclinical cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity compared to conventional modalities.
Does nuclear imaging improve the early detection and characterization of cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity compared to conventional surveillance in cancer patients?
Nuclear imaging serves as an emerging complementary modality in precision cardio-oncology, enabling earlier, mechanism-based detection of cardiotoxicity to support personalized surveillance.
Cardiovascular toxicity has emerged as a major determinant of long-term outcomes in cancer survivors as advances in oncologic therapies continue to improve survival. Conventional cardiac surveillance strategies predominantly rely on functional and structural changes, often identifying myocardial injury after clinically significant damage has occurred. The aim of this narrative review is to critically evaluate the role of nuclear imaging in advancing precision cardio-oncology by enabling earlier, mechanism-based detection and characterization of cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity. We summarize current clinical applications of PET- and SPECT-based imaging, examine molecular and tracer-level innovations, and discuss emerging hybrid imaging and analytic approaches relevant to individualized cardiovascular risk stratification. Current literature indicates that nuclear imaging provides unique insights into myocardial perfusion, metabolism, inflammation, and microvascular dysfunction, facilitating detection of subclinical injury across diverse anticancer therapies, including anthracyclines, targeted agents, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. By integrating molecular imaging with conventional modalities, nuclear techniques support more personalized surveillance and management strategies. This narrative review highlights nuclear imaging as an emerging complementary modality within precision cardio-oncology supporting earlier detection and risk stratification, and outlines future directions required to optimize its clinical integration and impact on cardiovascular outcomes across the cancer care continuum.
Ayalew et al. (Mon,) conducted a review in Cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity. Nuclear imaging (PET and SPECT) vs. Conventional cardiac surveillance strategies was evaluated. Nuclear imaging techniques, including PET and SPECT, facilitate earlier detection and characterization of subclinical cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity compared to conventional modalities.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: