The rapid expansion of subway systems has led to significant carbon emissions during station construction, yet a systematic and interpretable framework for evaluating low-carbon performance across different construction methods remains underdeveloped. To address this gap, this study proposes a comprehensive evaluation model that integrates a pressure–state–response (PSR) framework with an entropy-weighted TOPSIS method. A multi-dimensional indicator system comprising 17 indicators was established, covering material and energy consumption (pressure), environmental carbon states (state), and management responses (response). The entropy weight method was employed to determine objective indicator weights, and the TOPSIS method was used to rank the overall low-carbon performance of different construction schemes. An empirical study of a subway station in Guangzhou, China, was conducted to compare three construction methods: open-cut, top-down cover excavation, and reverse cover excavation. The results demonstrate that the reverse cover excavation method achieves the highest low-carbon performance. Electricity consumption and concrete-related emissions were identified as the most influential factors, while obstacle analysis revealed key constraints for carbon reduction. The proposed PSR–entropy–TOPSIS framework offers a transparent, data-driven decision-support tool for optimizing construction schemes, contributing to the sustainable development goals of urban rail transit projects.
Ruan et al. (Mon,) studied this question.