Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking is a promising tool for assessing regional myocardial function, with circumferential strain being the most reproducible parameter, though standardization is still required.
Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance-feature tracking reliably assess myocardial deformation compared to established techniques in healthy subjects and patients with cardiovascular diseases?
CMR-feature tracking is a promising tool for assessing myocardial deformation, with circumferential strain being the most reproducible, but standardization and validation are needed for routine clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is an important modality that allows the assessment of regional myocardial function by measuring myocardial deformation parameters, such as strain and strain rate throughout the cardiac cycle. Feature tracking is a promising quantitative post-processing technique that is increasingly used. It is commonly applied to cine images, in particular steady-state free precession, acquired during routine CMR examinations. OBJECTIVE: To review the studies that have used feature tracking techniques in healthy subjects or patients with cardiovascular diseases. The article emphasizes the advantages and limitations of feature tracking when applied to regional deformation parameters. The challenges of applying the techniques in clinics and potential solutions are also reviewed. RESULTS: Research studies in healthy volunteers and/or patients either applied CMR-feature tracking alone to assess myocardial motion or compared it with either established CMR-tagging techniques or to speckle tracking echocardiography. These studies assessed the feasibility and reliability of calculating or determining global and regional myocardial deformation strain parameters. Regional deformation parameters are reviewed and compared. Better reproducibility for global deformation was observed compared with segmental parameters. Overall, studies demonstrated that circumferential was the most reproducible deformation parameter, usually followed by longitudinal strain; in contrast, radial strain showed high variability. CONCLUSION: Although feature tracking is a promising tool, there are still discrepancies in the results obtained using different software packages. This highlights a clear need for standardization of MRI acquisition parameters and feature tracking analysis methodologies. Validation, including physical and numerical phantoms, is still required to facilitate the use of feature tracking in routine clinical practice.
Almutairi et al. (Wed,) conducted a review in Cardiovascular diseases. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-feature tracking (CMR-FT) vs. CMR-tagging or echocardiography was evaluated. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking is a promising tool for assessing regional myocardial function, with circumferential strain being the most reproducible parameter, though standardization is still required.