PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 25, 1980Science1,462 citations

The Phylogeny of Prokaryotes

View Full Paper
GFG. E. FoxESErko StackebrandtRHRobert B. Hespell

Key Points

  • This research aims to elucidate the phylogenetic relationships among prokaryotes using ribosomal RNA sequences.
  • Used 16S ribosomal RNA sequence characterization for phylogenetic analysis.
  • Identified splits among archaebacteria and true bacteria (eubacteria).
  • Explored the ancestry of various bacterial phenotypes including anaerobic and photosynthetic types.
  • Highlighted a deep phylogenetic split between archaebacteria and eubacteria.
  • Indicated that ancient bacterial phenotypes are primarily anaerobic, while aerobic forms arose multiple times.
  • Challenged the belief that the first bacteria were exclusively anaerobic heterotrophs.

Abstract

For the first time a single experimental approach, 16 S ribosomal RNA sequence characterization, has been used to develop an overview of phylogenetic relationships in the bacterial world. The technique permits the tracing of relationships back to the common ancestor of all extant life. This first glimpse of bacterial phylogeny reveals a world whose roots appear to span more than 3 billion years. A deep phylogenetic split exists among the bacteria, which necessitates their division into two major lines of descent, the archaebacteria and the true bacteria (or eubacteria). It is a general finding that the most ancient bacterial phenotypes are anaerobic, and that aerobic phenotypes have arisen a number of times. Photosynthetic phenotypes are also extremely ancient. Many nonphotosynthetic groups appear to have arisen from photosynthetic ancestry, which is reason to question the generally held belief that the first bacteria were anaerobic heterotrophs. The two ultimate lines of bacterial descent are no more closely related to one another than either is to the cytoplasmic aspect of the eukaryotic cell. However, in that the eukaryotic cell is a phylogenetic chimera, it itself cannot be seen as a line of descent comparable to the two bacterial lines—although some of its individual parts can be so viewed. In this way, the chloroplast and perhaps the mitochondrion are each eubacterial, and at least one ribosomal protein is archaebacterial. A third line of descent that is neither eubacterial nor archaebacterial is represented in the 18 S ribosomal RNA.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fox et al. (1980) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f83142badbc352afe4638https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6771870
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The winds of (evolutionary) change: breathing new life into microbiology1994 · 924 citations
  2. 2The neomuran origin of archaebacteria, the negibacterial root of the universal tree and bacterial megaclassification.2002 · 430 citations
  3. 3Illuminating the coevolution of photosynthesis and Bacteria2024 · 12 citations
  4. 4A phylogenomic approach to microbial evolution2001 · 183 citations
  5. 5DPANN Archaea and CPR Bacteria: insights into early cellular evolution?2025