PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 30, 2007Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology211 citationsOpen Access

A comparison of LMP‐based and ultrasound‐based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records

View Full Paper
PDPatricia M. DietzLELucinda J. EnglandWCWilliam M. Callaghan

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Although early ultrasound (or=42 weeks). The sensitivity of the LMP-based preterm birth estimate was 64.3%, and the positive predictive value was 58.7%. Overall, 17.2% of the records had estimates with an absolute difference of >14 days. The groups most likely to have inconsistent gestational age estimates included African American and Hispanic women, younger and less-educated women, and those who entered prenatal care after the second month of pregnancy. In conclusion, we found substantial misclassification of LMP-based gestational age. The 2003 revised US Standard Certificate of Live Birth includes a new gestational age item, the obstetric estimate. It will be important to assess whether this estimate addresses the problems presented by LMP-based gestational age.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dietz et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f933fd8c5cf602efce120https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00862.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper