Left Ventricular Strain Measurements Derived from MR Feature Tracking: A Head‐to‐Head Comparison of a Higher Temporal Resolution Method With a Conventional Method

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance feature tracking (MR-FT) is an imaging technique that quantifies both global and regional myocardial strain. Currently, conventional MR-FT provides a superior signal and contrast-to-noise ratio but has a relatively low temporal resolution. A higher temporal resolution MR-FT technique may provide improved results. PURPOSE: To explore the impact of higher temporal resolution on left ventricular (LV) myocardial strain measurements using MR-FT. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: One hundred and fifty-three participants including five healthy subjects and patients with various cardiac diseases referred to MR for cardiac assessment. FIELD STRENGTH: 3 T, balanced steady-state free precession sequence with and without compressed sensing (temporal resolution: 10 msec and 40 msec, respectively). ASSESSMENT: Conventional (40 msec) and higher (10 msec) temporal resolution data were acquired in all subjects during the same scanning session. Global circumferential strain (GCS), global longitudinal strain (GLS), and global radial strain (GRS) as well as peak systolic and diastolic strain rates (SRs) were measured by MR-FT and compared between the two temporal resolutions. We also performed subgroup analyses according to heart rates (HRs) and LV ejection fraction (LVEF). STATISTICAL TESTS: Paired t-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, linear regression analyses, Bland-Altman plots. A P value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: GCS and GRS were significantly higher in the 10-msec temporal resolution studies compared to the 40-msec temporal resolution studies (GCS: -13.00 ± 6.58% vs. -12.51 ± 5.76%; GRS: 21.97 ± 14.54% vs. 20.62 ± 12.52%). In the subgroup analyses, significantly higher GLS, GCS, and GRS values were obtained in subjects with LVEF ≥50%, and significantly higher GCS and GRS values were obtained in subjects with HRs <70 bpm when assessed with the 10-msec vs. the 40-msec temporal resolutions. All the peak systolic and diastolic SRs were significantly higher in the higher temporal resolution acquisitions. This was also true for all subgroups. DATA CONCLUSIONS: Higher temporal resolution resulted in significantly higher cardiac strain and SR values using MR-FT and could be beneficial, particularly in patients with LVEF ≥50% and HR <70 bpm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.