Perceived street vitality directly reflects residents’ assessments of the attractiveness of the street environment; it is not only an important focus of urban vitality research but also closely related to human-centred sustainable urban development. However, limited data availability and the complexity of urban environments have constrained fine-grained spatial analysis at the city scale. To address this issue, this study quantified perceived street vitality by collecting street-view imagery, extracting streetscape features, and integrating these data with questionnaire survey results. After comparing multiple models, a geographically weighted machine learning model was employed to identify key visual predictors, model-estimated marginal associations, interaction patterns, and spatial heterogeneity related to perceived street vitality. The results show that areas with high perceived street vitality are mainly located along street segments with abundant greenery and open spaces, whereas low-value areas are concentrated in densely built and enclosed environments. Among the various streetscape elements, buildings, vegetation, and sky are the key visual elements most strongly associated with perceived street vitality. A model incorporating these elements accounted for 67.2% of the variance in perceived street vitality. Notably, the strength of these associations varied significantly across different areas. This study provides empirical evidence and evidence-based support for sustainable urban renewal, the optimisation of street-space layouts in high-density urban areas, and the improvement in street environmental quality.
Zhang et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: