PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1985Heart20 citationsOpen Access

Nuclear magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

MBMartin BeenDKD. M. KeanMSM.A. Smith

Structured PICO

Can nuclear magnetic resonance detect and quantify septal and free wall hypertrophy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy compared to normal subjects and those with left ventricular hypertrophy?

P
Population
33 subjects: 11 unselected patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 11 normal subjects, and 11 patients with electrocardiographic features of left ventricular hypertrophy.
I
Intervention
Non-gated nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging
C
Comparator
Echocardiography (for septal measurements) and comparison across the three subject groups
O
Outcome
Detection and quantification of septal and free wall hypertrophy, including ratio of septal to free wall thickness, septal and free wall area, and T1 valuessurrogate

Non-gated nuclear magnetic resonance can effectively detect septal and free wall hypertrophy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, correlating significantly with echocardiographic measurements.

Abstract

The large differences in the spin lattice relaxation times (T1) of blood and myocardium (measured by nuclear magnetic resonance) allow the heart to be visualised without the use of contrast media. The findings using nuclear magnetic resonance in 11 unselected patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were compared with those in equal numbers of normal subjects and patients with electrocardiographic features of left ventricular hypertrophy. In patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy characteristic septal hypertrophy was noted together with variable and sometimes pronounced hypertrophy of the left ventricular free wall, which is consistent with the heterogeneous nature of this disease. The mean (SD) ratio of septal to free wall thickness was 1.5(0.8) for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 0.8(0.2) for those with left ventricular hypertrophy, and 0.9(0.2) for normal subjects. Although septal measurements by nuclear magnetic resonance were greater than those obtained by echocardiography there was a significant correlation between the two. Septal and free wall area were significantly smaller in normal subjects. There were no differences in septal or free wall T1 values between the three groups. Non-gated nuclear magnetic resonance can detect septal and free wall hypertrophy. With the addition of multiple slice acquisition, rapid estimation of myocardial mass will be possible allowing the potentially important assessment of progression or regression of myocardial hypertrophy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Been et al. (1985) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a103456d8c5cf602efdd9b1https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.54.1.48
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1MR imaging of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.1992 · 49 citations
  2. 2Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Review Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging2022
  3. 3Correlation of Electrocardiographic Changes with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Findings in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy2017 · 1 citations
  4. 4Myocardial Tissue Characterization Using Magnetic Resonance Noncontrast T1 Mapping in Hypertrophic and Dilated Cardiomyopathy2012 · 357 citations
  5. 5Magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of apical hypertrophy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy1992 · 21 citations