PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1968American Journal of Sociology255 citations

The Social Psychology of Privacy

View Full Paper
BSBarry Schwartz

Key Points

  • To examine the structural and psychological role of privacy as a necessary counter-pattern to social interaction within social establishments.
  • Theoretical synthesis of interaction dynamics and behavioral withdrawal patterns in social systems.
  • Structural analysis of spatial proprieties, physical boundaries, and organizational norms that govern entrance into and exit from privacy.
  • Social contact beyond an irritation threshold necessitates institutionalized mechanisms for withdrawal and unobserved behavior.
  • Privacy distribution reflects and reinforces status divisions while permitting localized deviations that protect the collective from dysfunctional knowledge.
  • Physical structures such as doors and spatial norms serve as critical regulatory tools that safeguard individual identity and personal autonomy.

Abstract

Patterns of interaction in any social system are accompanied by counter-patterns of withdrawal, one highly institutionalized (but unexplored) mode of which is privacy. There exists a threshold beyond which social contact becomes irritating for all parties; therefore, some provision for removing oneself from interaction and observation must be built into every establishment. Such provisions subserve the action patterns for which they provide intermission. Privacy, which is bought and sold in social establishments, reflects and affirms status divisions, and permits "localized" deviation which is invisible to the group as a whole. Privacy thereby unsulates against dysfunctional knowledge. Rules governing entrance into and exit from privacy are most clearly articulated on the level of the establishment and are reflected in its physical structure and in proprieties concerning the uses of space, doors, windows, drawers, etc. The report ends with a discussion of identity and its relation to the freedoms of engagement and disengagement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Barry Schwartz (1968) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10790401be78fe8160eccdhttps://doi.org/10.1086/224567
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper