Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract This paper interrogates the currently pervasive discourse of the ‘net generation’ finding the concept of the ‘digital native’ especially problematic, both empirically and conceptually. We draw on a research project of South African higher education students' access to and use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) to show that age is not a determining factor in students' digital lives; rather, their familiarity and experience using ICTs is more relevant. We also demonstrate that the notion of a generation of ‘digital natives’ is inaccurate: those with such attributes are effectively a digital elite. Instead of a new net generation growing up to replace an older analogue generation, there is a deepening digital divide in South Africa characterized not by age but by access and opportunity; indeed, digital apartheid is alive and well. We suggest that the possibility for digital democracy does exist in the form of a mobile society which is not age specific, and which is ubiquitous. Finally, we propose redefining the concepts ‘digital’, ‘net’, ‘native’, and ‘generation’ in favour of reclaiming the term ‘digitizen’.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cheryl Brown
Laura Czerniewicz
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
University of Cape Town
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Brown et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10976ed478ddac0ffd3c12 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00369.x