PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 23, 2013European Heart Journal310 citationsOpen Access

Impact of coronary artery calcium on coronary heart disease events in individuals at the extremes of traditional risk factor burden: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

View Full Paper
MSMyrna SilvermanMBMichael J. BlahaHKHarlan M. Krumholz

Key Result

Individuals with 0 risk factors and CAC >300 had a CHD event rate 3.5 times higher than those with ≥3 risk factors and CAC 0 (10.9 vs. 3.1 per 1000 person-years).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=6,698)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does coronary artery calcium score predict coronary heart disease events in individuals at the extremes of traditional risk factor burden?

P
Population
6,698 individuals from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) stratified by traditional risk factor burden (0, 1, 2, or ≥3)
I
Intervention
Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score assessment (stratified as 0, 1-100, 101-300, and >300)
C
Comparator
Different categories of CAC score and risk factor burden
O
Outcome
Coronary heart disease (CHD) events over mean 7.1 ± 1 yearshard clinical

A high coronary artery calcium burden identifies individuals at elevated risk for CHD events even in the absence of traditional risk factors, whereas a CAC of 0 indicates low risk even among those with multiple risk factors.

Main Result

Effect estimate: 3.5 times higher

Absolute Event Rate: 10.9% vs 3.1%

Abstract

AIMS: We sought to evaluate the impact of coronary artery calcium (CAC) in individuals at the extremes of risk factor (RF) burden. METHODS AND RESULTS: 6698 individuals from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) were followed for coronary heart disease (CHD) events over mean 7.1 ± 1 years. Annualized CHD event rates were compared among each RF category (0, 1, 2, or ≥3) after stratification by CAC score (0, 1-100, 101-300, and >300). The following traditional modifiable RFs were considered: cigarette smoking, LDL cholesterol ≥3.4 mmol/L, low HDL cholesterol, hypertension, and diabetes. There were 1067 subjects (16%) with 0 RFs, whereas 1205 (18%) had ≥3 RFs. Among individuals with 0 RFs, 68% had CAC 0, whereas 12 and 5% had CAC >100 and >300, respectively. Among individuals with ≥3 RFs, 35% had CAC 0, whereas 34 and 19% had CAC >100 and >300, respectively. Overall, 339 (5.1%) CHD events occurred. Individuals with 0 RFs and CAC >300 had an event rate 3.5 times higher than individuals with ≥3 RFs and CAC 0 (10.9/1000 vs. 3.1/1000 person-years). Similar results were seen across categories of Framingham risk score. CONCLUSION: Among individuals at the extremes of RF burden, the distribution of CAC is heterogeneous. The presence of a high CAC burden, even among individuals without RFs, is associated with an elevated event rate, whereas the absence of CAC, even among those with many RF, is associated with a low event rate. Coronary artery calcium has the potential to further risk stratify asymptomatic individuals at the extremes of RF burden.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Silverman et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Asymptomatic individuals at extremes of risk factor burden (n=6,698). Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score >300 vs. CAC score 0 was evaluated on Coronary heart disease (CHD) events (3.5 times higher). Individuals with 0 risk factors and CAC >300 had a CHD event rate 3.5 times higher than those with ≥3 risk factors and CAC 0 (10.9 vs. 3.1 per 1000 person-years).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10f054660e36c398f3990dhttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht508
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper