PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 4, 2008Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology128 citations

A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials Comparing Radiofrequency Ablation with Antiarrhythmic Medications in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

View Full Paper
GNGirish M. NairElectrophysiologyPNPablo B. NeryElectrophysiologySDSYAMKUMAR DIWAKARAMENONHamilton Health Sciences

Key Result

Radiofrequency ablation reduced the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence at 1 year by 65% compared with antiarrhythmic medications.

Study Design

Type

Systematic Review

Structured PICO

Does radiofrequency ablation reduce atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to antiarrhythmic medications?

P
Population
Patients with atrial fibrillation (pooled from 6 randomized trials)
I
Intervention
Radiofrequency (RF) ablation
C
Comparator
Antiarrhythmic medications
O
Outcome
Atrial fibrillation recurrence at 1 year

Radiofrequency ablation is significantly more effective than antiarrhythmic medications for maintaining sinus rhythm at 1 year in selected patients with atrial fibrillation.

Main Result

Effect estimate: 65% risk reduction

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent arrhythmia seen in clinical practice. Until recently, antiarrhythmic medications have been the only commonly employed treatment for maintaining sinus rhythm. However, antiarrhythmic medications have a modest long-term efficacy and the potential for serious side effects. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation is now emerging as a viable alternative to antiarrhythmic medications in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with AF. Several randomized trials comparing RF ablation with antiarrhythmic medications have now been published. OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review of published randomized trials comparing RF ablation with antiarrhythmic medications in the treatment of AF. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed and two authors independently abstracted the data from trials. A statistical analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software (BIOSTAT, Englewood, NJ, USA). RESULTS: A total of six trials were identified. Overall, RF ablation reduced the risk of AF recurrence by 65% at 1 year compared with antiarrhythmic medications. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with AF, RF ablation reduced the risk of AF recurrence at 1 year by 65% compared with antiarrhythmic medications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nair et al. (2008) conducted a systematic review in Atrial fibrillation. Radiofrequency ablation vs. Antiarrhythmic medications was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation recurrence (65% risk reduction). Radiofrequency ablation reduced the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence at 1 year by 65% compared with antiarrhythmic medications.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1109086f378c85fcf33266https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01285.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Systematic Review: Comparative Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation2009 · 138 citations
  2. 2Curative ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review2008 · 19 citations
  3. 3Efficacy and safety of catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized trials2010 · 83 citations
  4. 4Comparison of radiofrequency ablation and antiarrhythmic drug for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis2022
  5. 5Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Review of the Literature2015 · 5 citations