PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 9, 2020BMC Anesthesiology10 citationsOpen Access

Retrospective analysis of cases of intraoperative awareness in a large multi-hospital health system reported in the early postoperative period

ADAmanda S. DeisMSMichael P. SchnetzJIJames W. Ibinson

Key Result

A retrospective review of 647,009 general anesthetics identified only 7 cases of intraoperative awareness (0.0011%), indicating that provider-reported adverse event data in the early postoperative period is highly insensitive.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=647,009)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

P
Population
7 cases of intraoperative awareness identified from provider-reported adverse event data from the electronic anesthesia records of 647,000 general anesthetics
I
Intervention
General anesthesia
O
Outcome
Intraoperative awareness with recallsafety

Provider-reported adverse event data in the immediate post-operative period are likely insensitive for detecting intraoperative awareness, but cases often share commonalities like obesity, TIVA use, and neuromuscular blockade.

Limitations

  • Retrospective nature limits ability to discern clinical decision-making details
  • Lack of long-term psychiatric follow-up documented for any of the patients
  • Reliance on self-reporting by providers marking an event flag in the electronic anesthesia record
  • Restricted time window for identifying and reporting AWR to the immediate post-operative period
  • under-reporting bias
  • causation cannot firmly be established
  • provider-reported adverse event data in the immediate post-operative period are likely insensitive

Abstract

Abstract Background Awareness with recall under general anesthesia remains a rare but important issue that warrants further study. Methods We present a series of seven cases of awareness that were identified from provider-reported adverse event data from the electronic anesthesia records of 647,000 general anesthetics. Results The low number of identified cases suggests an under-reporting bias. Themes that emerge from this small series can serve as important reminders to anesthesia providers to ensure delivery of an adequate anesthetic for each patient. Commonalities between a majority of our identified anesthetic awareness cases include: obesity, use of total intravenous anesthesia, use of neuromuscular blockade, and either a lack of processed electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring or documented high depth of consciousness index values. An interesting phenomenon was observed in one case, where adequately-dosed anesthesia was delivered without technical issue, processed EEG monitoring was employed, and the index value suggested an adequate depth of consciousness throughout the case. Conclusions Provider-reported adverse event data in the immediate post-operative period are likely insensitive for detecting cases of intraoperative awareness. Though causation cannot firmly be established from our data, themes identified in this series of cases of awareness with recall under general anesthesia provide important reminders for anesthesia providers to maintain vigilance in monitoring depth and dose of anesthesia, particularly with total intravenous anesthesia.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Deis et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Intraoperative awareness with recall (AWR) (n=647,009). General anesthesia was evaluated on Incidence of intraoperative awareness with recall (AWR) under general anesthesia. A retrospective review of 647,009 general anesthetics identified only 7 cases of intraoperative awareness (0.0011%), indicating that provider-reported adverse event data in the early postoperative period is highly insensitive.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a123daabb918b6e5b66e9f2https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-00974-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper