PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 11, 2017Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)285 citations

Biomarkers of acute kidney injury: the pathway from discovery to clinical adoption

View Full Paper
KKKianoush KashaniWCWisit CheungpasitpornCRClaudio Ronco

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of critical illnesses and has a significant impact on outcomes, including mortality and morbidities. Unfortunately, apart from prophylactic measures, no effective treatment for this syndrome is known. Therefore, early recognition of AKI not only can provide better opportunities for preventive interventions, but also opens many gates for research and development of effective therapeutic options. Over the last few years, several new AKI biomarkers have been discovered and validated to improve early detection, differential diagnosis, and differentiation of patients into risk groups for progressive renal failure, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), or death. These novel AKI biomarkers complement serum creatinine (SCr) and urine output, which are the standard diagnostic tools for AKI detection. In this article, we review the available literature on characteristics of promising AKI biomarkers that are currently the focus of preclinical and clinical investigations. These biomarkers include neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1), liver-type fatty acid-binding protein, interleukin 18 (lL-18), insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 (TIMP-2), calprotectin, urine angiotensinogen (AGT), and urine microRNA. We then describe the clinical performance of these biomarkers for diagnosis and prognostication. We also appraise each AKI biomarker's advantages and limitations as a tool for early AKI recognition and prediction of clinical outcomes after AKI. Finally, we review the current and future states of implementation of biomarkers in the clinical practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kashani et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12894b92637892a9a6c2aahttps://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-0973
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Metabolic Significance of Mammalian Fatty-Acid-Binding Proteins: Abundant Proteins in Search of a Function1987 · 281 citations
  2. 2Expression of Calcium-Binding Proteins MRP8 and MRP14 in Inflammatory Muscle Diseases2003 · 81 citations
  3. 3Induction of p21WAF1/CIP1/SDI1 in kidney tubule cells affects the course of cisplatin-induced acute renal failure.1998 · 272 citations
  4. 4Combination of biomarkers for diagnosis of acute kidney injury after cardiopulmonary bypass2015 · 102 citations
  5. 5Urinary Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin and Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery2008 · 266 citations