PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2007American Journal of Orthopsychiatry234 citations

A review of the literature on the effectiveness of housing and support, assertive community treatment, and intensive case management interventions for persons with mental illness who have been homeless.

View Full Paper
GNGeoffrey NelsonTATim AubryALAdèle Lafrance

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

A review of 16 controlled outcome evaluations of housing and support interventions for people with mental illness who have been homeless revealed significant reductions in homelessness and hospitalization and improvements in other outcomes (e.g., well-being) resulting from programs that provided permanent housing and support, assertive community treatment (ACT), and intensive case management (ICM). The best outcomes for housing stability were found for programs that combined housing and support (effect size = .67), followed by ACT alone (effect size = .47), while the weakest outcomes were found for ICM programs alone (effect size = .28). The results of this review were discussed in terms of their implications for policy, practice, and future research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nelson et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12c57683732aa7db9e4742https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.77.3.350
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper