For-profit hospitals had an average 30-day risk-standardized readmission rate 0.38 percentage points higher than public hospitals (95% CI, 0.24-0.53).
Cross-Sectional (n=6,789,839)
Yes
Are specific hospital characteristics associated with hospital-wide 30-day risk-standardized readmission rates in Medicare beneficiaries?
Hospital characteristics such as region, profit status, and urban/rural location are modestly associated with 30-day risk-standardized readmission rates, though variability among similar hospitals is large.
Effect estimate: Difference 0.38 percentage points (for-profit vs public) (95% CI 0.24-0.53)
BACKGROUND: Safety-net and teaching hospitals are somewhat more likely to be penalized for excess readmissions, but the association of other hospital characteristics with readmission rates is uncertain and may have relevance for hospital-centered interventions. OBJECTIVE: To examine the independent association of 8 hospital characteristics with hospital-wide 30-day risk-standardized readmission rate (RSRR). DESIGN: This is a retrospective cross-sectional multivariable analysis. SUBJECTS: US hospitals. MEASURES: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services specification of hospital-wide RSRR from July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014 with race and Medicaid dual-eligibility added. RESULTS: We included 6,789,839 admissions to 4474 hospitals of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged over 64 years. In multivariable analyses, there was regional variation: hospitals in the mid-Atlantic region had the highest RSRRs 0.98 percentage points higher than hospitals in the Mountain region; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.84-1.12. For-profit hospitals had an average RSRR 0.38 percentage points (95% CI, 0.24-0.53) higher than public hospitals. Both urban and rural hospitals had higher RSRRs than those in medium metropolitan areas. Hospitals without advanced cardiac surgery capability had an average RSRR 0.27 percentage points (95% CI, 0.18-0.36) higher than those with. The ratio of registered nurses per hospital bed was not associated with RSRR. Variability in RSRRs among hospitals of similar type was much larger than aggregate differences between types of hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, larger, urban, academic facilities had modestly higher RSRRs than smaller, suburban, community hospitals, although there was a wide range of performance. The strong regional effect suggests that local practice patterns are an important influence. Disproportionately high readmission rates at for-profit hospitals may highlight the role of financial incentives favoring utilization.
Horwitz et al. (Sat,) conducted a cross-sectional in Hospital readmission (n=6,789,839). Hospital characteristics (e.g., for-profit status, region, urban/rural) vs. Other hospital characteristics (e.g., public status, different regions) was evaluated on Hospital-wide 30-day risk-standardized readmission rate (RSRR) (Difference 0.38 percentage points (for-profit vs public), 95% CI 0.24-0.53). For-profit hospitals had an average 30-day risk-standardized readmission rate 0.38 percentage points higher than public hospitals (95% CI, 0.24-0.53).