How does the prediction of maximal heart rate and the relationship between heart rate and oxygen consumption differ between obese and normal-weight adults during exercise?
Obese individuals require a specific equation (200 - 0.5 x Age) to accurately predict maximal heart rate for exercise prescription, unlike normal-weight individuals who can use the standard 220 - Age equation.
This research derived regression equations for predicting maximal heart rate (MHR) and examined the relationship between relative oxygen consumption (VO2) and heart rate (HR) in obese (N = 86, body fat > 30%, hydrostatic weighing) compared with normal-weight (N = 51, body fat < or = 30%) adults. Simultaneous measurements of HR and VO2 were recorded at rest and every minute during a maximal graded exercise test. When MHR was regressed on age, two distinct equations for the obese and normalweights were generated. The relationship between %MHR and %max VO2 was similar between groups (r = 0.83, obese; r = 0.87 normalweights). Likewise, when %max VO2 was regressed on %max heart rate range similar equations were derived fro the obese (r = 0.81) and normalweights (r = 0.84). Correlation between Karvonen's predicted HR at a submaximal VO2 and the true HR at that VO2 was 0.88, regardless of adiposity. These data indicate that when predicting MHR in normalweights the equation 220-Age can be used, but for obese individuals the equation 200-0.5 x Age is more accurate; each having 12 as a standard error of estimate. Once MHR is determined, either the straight percentage technique or Karvonen's method would be appropriate for prescribing exercise intensity for both populations.
Miller et al. (Sat,) studied this question.