PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1997American Journal of Epidemiology86 citationsOpen Access

Test-Retest Reliability of the Cognitive Lifetime Drinking History

View Full Paper
MRMarcia RussellJMJames R. MarshallMTMaurizio Trevisan

Structured PICO

Does the Cognitive Lifetime Drinking History (CLDH) provide reliable estimates of lifetime alcohol consumption in post-MI patients and controls?

P
Population
Postmyocardial infarction patients (n = 81) and controls (n = 138) who had had at least 12 drinks in a year during their lifetimes
I
Intervention
Cognitive Lifetime Drinking History (CLDH) questionnaire (floating and fixed versions)
C
Comparator
Test-retest comparison (visits 1 week or more apart)
O
Outcome
Test-retest reliability for lifetime ounces of alcohol consumed and times intoxicatedpatient reported

The Cognitive Lifetime Drinking History (CLDH) is a reliable tool for assessing lifetime alcohol consumption in post-myocardial infarction patients and controls.

Abstract

A new measure of lifetime alcohol consumption, the Cognitive Lifetime Drinking History (CLDH) uses beverage-specific questions on drink sizes and assesses drinking patterns to enhance recall. Two methods of establishing drinking intervals were examined: 1) floating--the respondent's report of when drinking changed, and 2) fixed--defined in terms of decades. Test-retest reliability for lifetime ounces of alcohol consumed and times intoxicated in lifetime estimated at visits 1 week or more apart was assessed in postmyocardial infarction patients (n = 81) and controls (n = 138) who had had at least 12 drinks in a year during their lifetimes. No significant differences in estimates of lifetime ounces of alcohol or times intoxicated were observed. Spearman's r ranged between 0.85 and 0.92 for the floating and fixed versions of the CLDH administered at a single visit and between 0.74 and 0.85 for the floating or fixed administered at both visits. Time between visits did not influence correlations. Intervals reported on the floating CLDH were comparable for postmyocardial infarction patients and controls. It took approximately 5 minutes longer to administer the floating CLDH than the fixed CLDH. Findings support use of the CLDH for case-control studies and suggest that the floating and fixed versions would yield comparable results.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Russell et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13094145487b7639a79514https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009225
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper