PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 2026Advanced Science0 citationsOpen Access

Reprogramming the Immune Landscape of Inflammatory Breast Cancer

View Full Paper
VMVerena Martinez‐RodriguezSOSuguru OgataXWXiaoping Wang

Key Points

  • This review aims to explore the immunobiology of inflammatory breast cancer and identify strategies for improving immune responses.
  • Analysis of multi-omics and spatial transcriptomic studies to evaluate immune heterogeneity in IBC.
  • Review of clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors alone or in combination with other therapies.
  • Discussion on integrating immune biomarkers to enhance patient stratification and tailor immunotherapy.
  • IBC exhibits both 'immune-hot' and 'immune-cold' niches affecting immunotherapy response.
  • Clinical trials show promise for immune checkpoint inhibitors, yet face limitations with small sample sizes and inconsistent criteria.
  • Strategies to reprogram the tumor microenvironment may improve immune activation and patient outcomes.

Abstract

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer, characterized by rapid progression, early metastasis, and profound therapeutic resistance. Despite advances in multimodal therapy, outcomes remain poor, emphasizing the need for novel treatment strategies. Increasing evidence reveals that IBC exhibits an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), driven by interactions among tumor cells and TME components that promote immune evasion through cytokine signaling loops, immune checkpoint overexpression, and formation of tumor emboli that shield cancer cells from immune surveillance. Recent multi-omics and spatial transcriptomic studies reveal extensive immune heterogeneity, with both "immune-hot" and "immune-cold" niches influencing responses to immunotherapy. Clinical trials testing immune checkpoint inhibitors alone or combined with chemotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates, or targeted therapy show early promise but remain limited by small IBC cohorts and inconsistent diagnostic criteria. Integrating immune biomarkers, including PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, T-cell clonality, and spatial immune signatures, may improve patient stratification and therapeutic precision. This review summarizes mechanistic and clinical insights defining IBC immunobiology, highlights barriers to durable immune activation, and outlines strategies to reprogram the TME toward an immunoactive state. Advancing combination immunotherapy and adaptive clinical trial designs through global collaboration will be essential to improve outcomes for IBC patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Martinez‐Rodriguez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e8520e02ee3982d32fe0https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.75766
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Scientific highlights and perspectives from the International Inflammatory Breast Cancer Symposium 20252026 · 2 citations
  2. 2Harnessing the Inflammatory Signature: A Review for Biomarkers in Inflammatory Breast Cancer2025
  3. 3Inflammatory breast cancer microenvironment repertoire based on DNA methylation data deconvolution reveals actionable targets to enhance the treatment efficacy2024 · 8 citations
  4. 4Abstract 4886: An in-depth single-cell map of inflammatory breast cancer reveals wide-scaled restructuring associated to an immunosuppressive and inflammation-like microenvironment2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Abstract PS3-12-19: Spatial Immune Profiling in Inflammatory Breast Cancer Reveals a Central Role for Tumor-Associated Macrophages and a Spatial Context-Dependent Negative Prognostic Impact of B Cells2026