PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1978Heart116 citationsOpen Access

The natural history of a non-stenotic bicuspid aortic valve.

PMPeter MillsGLG LeechMDMichael J. Davies

Structured PICO

P
Population
41 patients with a diagnosis of a non-stenotic bicuspid aortic valve established by noninvasive techniques
O
Outcome
Development of calcific aortic valve stenosis, bacterial endocarditis, or clinical changehard clinical

Patients with non-stenotic bicuspid aortic valves generally have a stable course over a decade, but remain at risk for calcific aortic stenosis and bacterial endocarditis, warranting careful follow-up.

Abstract

Forty-one patients in whom the diagnosis of a non-stenotic bicuspid aortic valve had been established by noninvasive techniques were followed up for a mean of 10.9 years. During this period, 2 patients required aortic valve replacement because of the development of calcific aortic valve stenosis at the ages of 52 and 64 and 5 others developed evidence of mild aortic valve stenosis. The appearance of calcium in a bicuspid aortic valve suggests the possibility of subsequent calcific aortic stenosis, and patients with this feature should be carefully followed up. Bacterial endocarditis on the aortic valve occurred in 3 patients, one of whom developed severe aortic regurgitation and subsequently died. Patients with a bicuspid aortic valve are at definite risk from bacterial endocarditis and should receive appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis. In 26/41 (63%) patients there was no clinical change during the follow-up period, including 7 of the patients over the age of 50.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mills et al. (1978) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13fb3cc4c5e9e518627ba1https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.40.9.951
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper