Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 26, 2020ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)Open Access

Deep neural network using a genetic algorithm achieves ~94% accuracy for ECG-based arrhythmia detection.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Deciphering large data sets to determine appropriate information remains a challenge in ECG-based cardiovascular disease diagnosis and treatment.

Does a deep neural network combined with a genetic algorithm improve the accuracy of ECG-based arrhythmia detection compared to state-of-the-art methods?

Comparison

Deep neural network strategy with genetic algorithm vs state-of-the-art methods

Key result

A multitier deep neural network strategy using a genetic algorithm for ECG-based arrhythmia detection achieved an average accuracy of 0.94 and an F1 score of 0.953.

Authors

MHMohamed HammadAIAbdullah M. IliyasuASAbdülhamit Subaşı

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Hypothesis-generating for hybrid DNN arrhythmia detection; prospective trials needed before clinical adoption.

Structured PICO

Does a deep neural network combined with a genetic algorithm improve the accuracy of ECG-based arrhythmia detection compared to state-of-the-art methods?

P
Population
ECG signal datasets for cardiovascular disease diagnosis
I
Intervention
Deep neural network (DNN) strategy with genetic algorithm (GA) for feature extraction and classification
C
Comparator
State-of-the-art methods
O
Outcome
Classification accuracy and F1 scoresurrogate

A novel deep learning model combining DNN and genetic algorithms improves the accuracy and F1 score of ECG-based arrhythmia detection.

Cite This Study

Hammad et al. (2020) studied Arrhythmia. Deep neural network (DNN) strategy with genetic algorithm vs. State-of-the-art methods was evaluated on Average accuracy and F1 score. A multitier deep neural network strategy using a genetic algorithm for ECG-based arrhythmia detection achieved an average accuracy of 0.94 and an F1 score of 0.953.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a14e4b60b551a5972391359https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2020.3033072
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share