PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 7, 2016IEEE Transactions on Image Processing106 citations

High-Resolution Image Classification Integrating Spectral-Spatial-Location Cues by Conditional Random Fields

View Full Paper
JZJi ZhaoYZYanfei ZhongHSHong Shu

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

With the increase in the availability of high-resolution remote sensing imagery, classification is becoming an increasingly useful technique for providing a large area of detailed land-cover information by the use of these high-resolution images. High-resolution images have the characteristics of abundant geometric and detail information, which are beneficial to detailed classification. In order to make full use of these characteristics, a classification algorithm based on conditional random fields (CRFs) is presented in this paper. The proposed algorithm integrates spectral, spatial contextual, and spatial location cues by modeling the probabilistic potentials. The spectral cues modeled by the unary potentials can provide basic information for discriminating the various land-cover classes. The pairwise potentials consider the spatial contextual information by establishing the neighboring interactions between pixels to favor spatial smoothing. The spatial location cues are explicitly encoded in the higher order potentials. The higher order potentials consider the nonlocal range of the spatial location interactions between the target pixel and its nearest training samples. This can provide useful information for the classes that are easily confused with other land-cover types in the spectral appearance. The proposed algorithm integrates spectral, spatial contextual, and spatial location cues within a CRF framework to provide complementary information from varying perspectives, so that it can address the common problem of spectral variability in remote sensing images, which is directly reflected in the accuracy of each class and the average accuracy. The experimental results with three high-resolution images show the validity of the algorithm, compared with the other state-of-the-art classification algorithms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhao et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15307dcb0379474a81fd1fhttps://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2016.2577886
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Hybrid Object-Oriented Conditional Random Field Classification Framework for High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery2014 · 95 citations
  2. 2Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images1984 · 18,045 citations
  3. 3Mean shift: a robust approach toward feature space analysis2002 · 11,422 citations
  4. 4Markov Random Field Modeling in Image Analysis2009 · 832 citations
  5. 5Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis2005 · 2,752 citations