PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 26, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Unified Dissipative Vacuum Framework: From Cosmological Redshift to Nuclear Binding

View Full Paper
SPSergey Yurevich Paygachkin

Key Points

  • This research aims to connect cosmological observations to nuclear binding energies using a unified dissipative framework.
  • Calibrated the optico-hydrodynamic vacuum distance metric D(z) on the Pantheon+ Type Ia supernova sample with N=1590.
  • Calculated a characteristic viscosity parameter eta and derived nuclear binding energy predictions without nuclear adjustments.
  • Achieved a mean fractional prediction error of 3.67% for nuclear binding energies across stable isotopes from NIST.
  • The proposed model shows statistical comparability to the flat Lambda-CDM model with chi^2/N values of 0.901 versus 0.884.

Abstract

We present a unified dissipative framework that connects cosmological observations to nuclear binding energies through a single dimensionless parameter eta = 0. 4182%, interpreted as the viscosity of a vacuum substrate. Calibrating the optico-hydrodynamic vacuum (OHV) distance metric D (z) = RH * ln (1+z) * (1 + gamma * z) on the Pantheon+ Type Ia supernova sample (N = 1590, z > 0. 01) yields chi²/N = 0. 901, statistically comparable to flat Lambda-CDM (chi²/N = 0. 884). The resulting parameters (RH = 4146. 8 Mpc, gamma = 0. 583) imply a characteristic viscosity eta = 0. 4182%. Remarkably, this cosmologically-derived parameter, without any adjustment to nuclear data, predicts nuclear binding energies across the periodic table through three-dimensional geometric normalization: BE (A) = eta * A * mᵤ * sqrt (3) * S (A). Testing on stable isotopes from NIST yields a mean fractional prediction error of just 3. 67% (average accuracy 96. 3%) for medium and heavy nuclei (A >= 20), performing comparably to the highly optimized Semi-Empirical Mass Formula despite utilizing zero nuclear-fitted parameters. This result suggests a scale-invariant dissipative mechanism linking photon propagation at gigaparsec scales to energy localization at nuclear scales (~ 10^-15 m), spanning 41 orders of magnitude. We discuss the physical interpretation, limitations, and falsifiable predictions of the framework.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sergey Yurevich Paygachkin (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a153b00b5d9c58d83e8d33chttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20365785
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper