PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1991European Heart Journal4 citations

Aortic valve replacement with the Lillehei-Kaster prosthesis in 262 patients: An assessment after 9 to 17 years

View Full Paper
KOKnud H. OlesenAWA WennevoldIRI. H. Rygg

Key Result

Aortic valve replacement with the Lillehei-Kaster prosthesis resulted in a 15-year survival rate of 49%, with 94% freedom from valve-related death and 85% freedom from thromboembolism.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=262)

Structured PICO

What are the long-term survival and complication rates following aortic valve replacement with the Lillehei-Kaster prosthesis?

P
Population
262 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, mean age 53 years. Includes patients with aortic stenosis, aortic incompetence, and combined lesions.
I
Intervention
Aortic valve replacement with the Lillehei-Kaster prosthesis
C
Comparator
General population (for relative survival analysis)
O
Outcome
Long-term survival (at 5, 10, and 15 years)hard clinical

Aortic valve replacement with the Lillehei-Kaster prosthesis demonstrates favorable long-term survival and low complication rates up to 15 years, though patients with aortic incompetence have lower relative survival than those with pure stenosis, suggesting earlier intervention may be beneficial.

Abstract

A 9 to 17-year follow-up after aortic valve replacement with the Lillehei-Kaster prosthesis was carried out in 262 patients with a mean age of 53 years. All patients were traced. The operative mortality was 7.3%. The observed survival of the total series after 5, 10 and 15 years amounted to 75%, 61%, and 49% respectively. The majority of survivors showed improvement of functional capacity and decrease of heart volume. Freedom from valve-related death, thromboembolism and valve-related morbidity and mortality after 15 years amounted to 94%, 85% and 75% respectively. Only two instances of valve thrombosis were seen, and fracture of the prosthesis was never encountered. These results compare favourably with those obtained with the Starr-Edwards and the Björk-Shiley prostheses. Analysis of the relative survival rates, i.e. the observed survival rates as ratios of those of the general population, indicates that the 10-year survival of patients with aortic stenosis is close to normal, whereas the survival rates of patients with aortic incompetence and with combined aortic stenosis and incompetence are significantly lower. It is suggested that earlier operation should be considered in patients with aortic incompetence and with combined stenosis and incompetence in order to lower the late mortality rate.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Olesen et al. (1991) conducted a cohort in Aortic valve disease requiring replacement (n=262). Aortic valve replacement with the Lillehei-Kaster prosthesis vs. General population (for relative survival rates) was evaluated on Observed survival at 15 years. Aortic valve replacement with the Lillehei-Kaster prosthesis resulted in a 15-year survival rate of 49%, with 94% freedom from valve-related death and 85% freedom from thromboembolism.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a156fcea2352da347826f70https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/12.6.680
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper