Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
How do attitudes and social affiliations coevolve? A long stream of research has focused on the relationship between attitudes and social affiliations. However, in most of this research the causal relationship between views and affiliations is difficult to discern definitively: Do people influence each other’s views so that they converge over time or do they primarily affiliate (by choice or happenstance) with those of similar views? Here we use longitudinal attitudinal and whole network data collected at critical times (notably, at the inception of the system) to identify robustly the determinants of attitudes and affiliations. We find significant conformity tendencies: Individuals shift their political views toward the political views of their associates. This conformity is driven by social ties rather than task ties. We also find that political views are notably unimportant as a driver for the formation of relationships. Keywords social network, social influence, homophily How people simultaneously construct and are molded by their social milieu is one of the foundational questions of social science. In the study of politics, this was the central question of Lazarsfeld and collaborators (Lazarsfeld et al., 1948; Berelson, 1954), and in more recent years Huckfeldt, Sprague, and colleagues (Huckfeldt, Plutzer, Sprague,
Lazer et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: