Both endurance and sprint interval training similarly increased VO2peak at the group level, but individual responses varied significantly between protocols, with all participants responding to at least one variable when exposed to both.
RCT (n=21)
Open-label
Randomized crossover
No
Does sprint interval training compared to endurance training elicit different individual adaptive responses in VO2peak, lactate threshold, and submaximal heart rate in recreationally active adults?
Individual physiological responses to exercise are highly variable, and non-response to one training modality (endurance or sprint interval) can often be overcome by switching to the other.
Absolute Event Rate: 3.1% vs 3.1%
p-value: p=<0.05
The current study examined the adaptive response to both endurance (END) and sprint interval training (SIT) in a group of twenty-one recreationally active adults. All participants completed three weeks (four days/ week) of both END (30 minutes at ~65% VO2peak work rate (WR) and SIT (eight, 20-second intervals at ~170% VO2peak WR separated by 10 seconds of active rest) following a randomized crossover study design with a three-month washout period between training interventions. While a main effect of training was observed for VO2peak, lactate threshold, and submaximal heart rate (HR), considerable variability was observed in the individual responses to both END and SIT. No significant positive relationships were observed between END and SIT for individual changes in any variable. Non-responses were determined using two times the typical error (TE) of measurement for VO2peak (0.107 L/min), lactate threshold (15.7 W), and submaximal HR (10.7bpm). Non-responders in VO2peak, lactate threshold, and submaximal HR were observed following both END and SIT, however, the individual patterns of response differed following END and SIT. Interestingly, all individuals responded in at least one variable when exposed to both END and SIT. These results suggest that the individual response to exercise training is highly variable following different training protocols and that the incidence of non-response to exercise training may be reduced by changing the training stimulus for non-responders to three weeks of END or SIT.
Bonafiglia et al. (Fri,) conducted a rct in Healthy recreationally active adults (n=21). Sprint interval training (SIT) vs. Endurance training (END) - 30 minutes at ~65% VO2peak work rate, 4 days/week was evaluated on VO2peak (L/min) (p=<0.05). Both endurance and sprint interval training similarly increased VO2peak at the group level, but individual responses varied significantly between protocols, with all participants responding to at least one variable when exposed to both.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: