PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 2026ACS Chemical Neuroscience0 citations

Structural Basis of Frizzled-Wnt in Recognition of Aβ Unveils Mechanism of Aβ-Mediated Disruption

View Full Paper
JMJinfei MeiRZRuhua ZhaYQYuqin Qiu

Key Points

  • This study aims to elucidate the structural interactions between Aβ oligomers and the Frizzled-Wnt complex, particularly focusing on the impact of histidine conformational heterogeneity.
  • Utilized molecular dynamics simulations to examine Aβ oligomers' interactions with Frizzled
  • Conducted free energy and RMSF calculations to assess binding affinities and conformational changes
  • Analyzed the effects of different histidine forms on Aβ binding
  • Aβ42 showed significantly higher binding affinity (ΔG* = −13.33 kcal/mol) compared to Aβ40
  • Aβ oligomers induced substantial conformational perturbations in the Frizzled-Wnt complex, affecting its clasp structure
  • Identified key hydrophobic residues that drive binding, while charged residues modulate the interactions

Abstract

Although previous studies have confirmed that Aβ oligomers (AβO) can bind to Frizzled and inhibit Wnt signaling, the molecule details and the impact of AβO structural heterogeneity remain unclear. This study utilized molecular dynamics simulation, combined with free energy, RMSF and other calculations, to systematically explore the interaction molecule details of different histidine conformational forms (ε→δ) of AβO with the Fz-Wnt complex. The results indicated that AβO could induce significant conformational perturbations in both the dissociative Fz-CRD domain and the full Fz-Wnt complex. Notably, Aβ42 exhibited a stronger perturbing effect than Aβ40. Free energy calculations further revealed that the binding affinity of Aβ42 was significantly higher than that of Aβ40, with the FW-(εδδ)42 complex showing the strongest binding (ΔG* = −13.33 kcal/mol). At the residue level, hydrophobic residues (F4, L17, F19, M35, V40) serve as the core region driving AβO binding, whereas charged residues (D1, E3, R5, K16) modulate the interaction in different histidine tautomeric forms. Importantly, through analysis of how the “clasp” structure of Fz-Wnt was affected by AβO, the “unlocking” mechanism of AβO was revealed: The binding of AβO can cause a two-way size change of the clasp interface ranging from −0.35 nm (contraction) to +0.43 nm (expansion). In summary, this study for the first time reveals that histidine tautomerism regulates the binding affinity of Aβ-Fz and clarifies an allosteric “clamping-unlock” mechanism that goes beyond simple competitive inhibition, providing novel insights at the molecule level into AβO interfering with Wnt signal transduction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mei et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a168a4b0c924ddd1bd58ff3https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.5c01028
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper