PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 2006Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology205 citations

Risk Scores for Predicting Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy

View Full Paper
WKWilliam F. KeaneZZZhongxin ZhangPLPaulette A. Lyle

Key Result

A risk score combining urinary albumin:creatinine ratio, serum albumin, serum creatinine, and hemoglobin strongly predicted ESRD (HR 49.0 for fourth vs first quartile) in diabetic nephropathy.

Key Points

  • To develop and validate a multivariable baseline risk score to predict progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), with or without all-cause mortality, in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy.
  • Derived risk score coefficients from multivariate analysis of baseline clinical variables using the RENAAL study cohort.
  • Included four independent baseline risk factors: urinary albumin:creatinine ratio, serum albumin, serum creatinine, and hemoglobin.
  • Evaluated model robustness across baseline nephropathy severity, sex, race, and treatment assignments.
  • The derived ESRD risk score equation was: (1.96 × log[urinary albumin:creatinine ratio]) - (0.78 × serum albumin [g/dl]) + (1.28 × serum creatinine [mg/dl]) - (0.11 × hemoglobin [g/dl]).
  • Comparing the fourth quartile to the first quartile of the composite ESRD risk score yielded a hazard ratio (HR) of 49.0.
  • The multivariable score substantially outperformed individual predictors alone: urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (HR 14.7), serum albumin (HR 10.2), serum creatinine (HR 9.2), and hemoglobin (HR 5.5).

Study Design

Type

Observational

Structured PICO

Does a combined risk score better predict ESRD in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy compared to individual risk predictors?

P
Population
Patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy from the RENAAL study
I
Intervention
A risk score combining urinary albumin:creatinine ratio, serum albumin, serum creatinine, and hemoglobin
C
Comparator
Individual components of the risk score
O
Outcome
End-stage renal disease (ESRD), with and without deathhard clinical

A risk score combining urinary albumin:creatinine ratio, serum albumin, serum creatinine, and hemoglobin strongly predicts the development of ESRD in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy, outperforming individual components.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 49.0

Abstract

Diabetic nephropathy is the most important cause of ESRD. The aim of this study was to develop a risk score from risk predictors for ESRD, with and without death, in the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study and to compare ability of the ESRD risk score and its components to predict ESRD. The risk score was developed from coefficients of independent risk factors from multivariate analysis of baseline variables and equals (1.96 x log urinary albumin:creatinine ratio) - (0.78 serum albumin g/dl) + (1.28 x serum creatinine mg/dl) - (0.11 x hemoglobin g/dl). It was robust with respect to severity of nephropathy, gender, race, and treatment group. The risk score for ESRD or death was comparable. The four risk predictors for progression of kidney disease were independent of therapy. For combined treatment groups, the hazard ratio between the fourth and first quartiles of the ESRD risk score was 49.0, as compared with the corresponding hazard ratios for each component: 14.7 for urinary albumin:creatinine ratio, 9.2 for serum creatinine, 5.5 for hemoglobin, and 10.2 for serum albumin. The RENAAL risk scores for ESRD with or without death emphasize the importance of identification of level of albuminuria, serum albumin, serum creatinine, and hemoglobin to predict development of ESRD in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. Although albuminuria is a strong risk factor for ESRD, the contribution of serum albumin, serum creatinine, and hemoglobin level further enhances prediction of ESRD. Future trials with a similar patient population and outcomes measures should consider adjusting analyses for baseline risk factors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Keane et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy. ESRD risk score vs. Individual risk predictors was evaluated on ESRD, with and without death (HR 49.0). A risk score combining urinary albumin:creatinine ratio, serum albumin, serum creatinine, and hemoglobin strongly predicted ESRD (HR 49.0 for fourth vs first quartile) in diabetic nephropathy.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16b1e67cba52b0f77b7b7dhttps://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.01381005
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper