PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1998American Psychologist639 citations

Early intervention and early experience.

View Full Paper
CRCraig T. RameySRSharon Landesman Ramey

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

For 4 decades, vigorous efforts have been based on the premise that early intervention for children of poverty and, more recently, for children with developmental disabilities can yield significant improvements in cognitive, academic, and social outcomes. The history of these efforts is briefly summarized and a conceptual framework presented to understand the design, research, and policy relevance of these early interventions. This framework, biosocial developmental contextualism, derives from social ecology, developmental systems theory, developmental epidemiology, and developmental neurobiology. This integrative perspective predicts that fragmented, weak efforts in early intervention are not likely to succeed, whereas intensive, high-quality, ecologically pervasive interventions can and do. Relevant evidence is summarized in 6 principles about efficacy of early intervention. The public policy challenge in early intervention is to contain costs by more precisely targeting early interventions to those who most need and benefit from these interventions. The empirical evidence on biobehavioral effects of early experience and early intervention has direct relevance to federal and state policy development and resource allocation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ramey et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16cdd1b13aec50ea6b8604https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.53.2.109
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper