PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2008Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology91 citations

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Implantable Cardiac Rhythm Devices at 3.0 Tesla

View Full Paper
JGJohn Gimbel

Key Result

Carefully tailored 3.0 Tesla MRI scans in 14 patients with cardiac rhythm devices resulted in 0 arrhythmias and no significant changes in device parameters.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=14)

Structured PICO

Is 3.0 Tesla MRI safe for patients with implantable cardiac rhythm devices when using a tailored monitoring and reprogramming strategy?

P
Population
14 patients with a variety of implantable cardiac rhythm devices from various manufacturers. No restrictions on pacemaker dependency, region scanned, device type, or manufacturer.
I
Intervention
3.0 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) using an 'MRI-S' strategy (device reprogramming, multimodal monitoring, electrophysiologist present, SAR limited to 2W/kg)
O
Outcome
Safety and device function (arrhythmias, changes in programmed parameters, pacing thresholds, sensing, impedance, or battery parameters) immediately after and 1-3 months after MRIsafety

Carefully tailored 3.0 Tesla MRI scans can be safely performed in patients with cardiac rhythm devices using specific reprogramming and monitoring strategies.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A relaxation of the prohibition of scanning cardiac rhythm device patients is underway, largely because of the growing experience of safe scanning events at 1.5T. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3T is becoming more common and may pose a different risk profile and outcome of MRI of cardiac device patients. METHODS: No restrictions were placed on pacemaker dependency, region scanned, device type, or manufacturer. Sixteen scans at 3T were performed with an electrophysiologist present on 14 patients with a variety of devices from various manufacturers. An "MRI-S" strategy was used. Multimodal monitoring was required. Device interrogation was performed prior to, immediately after, and 1-3 months after the MRI. For nonpacemaker-dependent device patients, attempts were made to turn all device features off (with OOO programming the goal) conceptually rendering the device "invisible." In pacemaker-dependent patients, the device was programmed to asynchronous mode at highest output for the duration of the scan with the goal of rendering the device conceptually "invulnerable" to MRI effects. The specific absorption rate (SAR) was limited to 2W/kg. RESULTS: All patients were successfully scanned. No arrhythmias were noted. No significant change in the programmed parameters, pacing thresholds, sensing, impedance, or battery parameters was noted. The insertable loop recorder (ILR) recorded prolonged artifactual asystole during MRI. One patient noted chest burning during the scan. CONCLUSIONS: Device patients may undergo carefully tailored 3T MRI scans when pre-MRI reprogramming of the device occurs in conjunction with extensive monitoring, supervision, and follow-up.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

John Gimbel (2008) conducted an observational in Implantable cardiac rhythm devices (n=14). 3.0 Tesla MRI with tailored device reprogramming was evaluated on Safety and device parameter changes (arrhythmias, pacing thresholds, sensing, impedance, battery parameters). Carefully tailored 3.0 Tesla MRI scans in 14 patients with cardiac rhythm devices resulted in 0 arrhythmias and no significant changes in device parameters.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16d9b61375058a29056db7https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01117.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper