PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1996The Philosophical Review205 citations

Holes and Other Superficialities.

View Full Paper
DLDavid LewisRCRoberto CasatiAVAchille C. Varzi

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This investigation on the borderlines of metaphysics, everyday geometry and the theory of perception seeks to answer two basic questions: Do holes really exist? If they do, what are they? Holes are among entities that down-to-earth philosophers would like to expel from their ontological inventory. Casati and Varzi argues in favour of holes' existence, examining their ontology of holes, their geometry, their part-whole relations, their identity, their causal role and the ways we perceive them.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lewis et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1760451b114e5976b3f985https://doi.org/10.2307/2185764
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper