Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The majority of spatial data provided as Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) are roads and other linear map features. Such data have been widely used in routing and navigation, road network update, emergency response, urban planning and more. Due to the lack of cartographic standards and issues with volunteer credibility, the quality of VGI linear features remains a concern and could seriously hinder the broad application of VGI data. This research proposes a comprehensive quality assessment framework for VGI linear features which adopts factor analysis to integrate two novel quality metrics with six other commonly used metrics, and further examines the spatial autocorrelation and semantic correlation of VGI linear feature quality. The OpenStreetMap road network of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania (USA) was selected as an example to test the proposed framework. Our results suggest that the proposed metrics, Box-counting dimension difference and Link accuracy are feasible for detecting quality issues and are important supplements to the common quality metrics. The findings also show that significant spatial autocorrelation exists in spatial completeness, positional accuracy, and logical consistency. Road type such as Tertiary, Residential, Service and Link has been proven to be a typical indicator of the different quality elements for VGI linear features.
Wu et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: