PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 19, 2011Journal of Medical Economics7 citations

Evolutionary cost analysis of valsartan initiation among patients with hypertension: a time series approach

View Full Paper
PSPeter P. SunJCJoanne ChangJZJie Zhang

Key Result

Valsartan initiation in hypertensive patients reversed a $10 monthly increase in medical costs to a $6 monthly decrease (p<0.01), achieving a cost-offset point by the 4th post-initiation month.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=18,269)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does valsartan initiation reduce monthly medical costs in commercially insured hypertensive patients?

P
Population
18,269 commercially insured hypertensive patients aged 18-63 (mean age 53, 53% female) with continuous enrollment for 24 months pre- and post-initiation.
I
Intervention
Valsartan initiation
C
Comparator
Forecasted medical costs for the same patients without initiation (using ARIMA time series model)
O
Outcome
Monthly medical costs

Valsartan initiation in hypertensive patients is associated with a gradual decrease in monthly medical costs, offsetting initial costs by the fourth month.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.01

Limitations

  • Data representativeness
  • Ability to collect unrecorded clinical conditions, treatments, and costs
  • Generalizability to patients with different characteristics

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examines the evolutionary impact of valsartan initiation on medical costs. METHODS: A retrospective time series study design was used with a large, US national commercial claims database for the period of 2004-2008. Hypertensive patients who initiated valsartan between the ages of 18 and 63, and had continuous enrollment for 24-month pre-initiation period and 24-month post-initiation period were selected. Patients' monthly medical costs were calculated based on individual claims. A novel time series model was devised with monthly medical costs as its dependent variables, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) as its stochastic components, and four indicative variables as its decomposed interventional components. The number of post-initiation months before a cost-offset point was also assessed. RESULTS: Patients (n = 18, 269) had mean age of 53 at the initiation date, and 53% of them were female. The most common co-morbid conditions were dyslipidemia (52%), diabetes (24%), and hypertensive complications (17%). The time series model suggests that medical costs were increasing by approximately 10 per month (p < 0. 01) before the initiation, and decreasing by approximately 6 per month (p < 0. 01) after the initiation. After the 4th post-initiation month, medical costs for patients with the initiation were statistically significantly lower (p < 0. 01) than forecasted medical costs for the same patients without the initiation. LIMITATIONS: The study has its limitations in data representativeness, ability to collect unrecorded clinical conditions, treatments, and costs, as well as its generalizability to patients with different characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Commercially insured hypertensive patients experienced monthly medical cost increase before valsartan initiation. Based on our model, the evolutionary impact of the initiation on medical costs included a temporary cost surge, a gradual, consistent, and statistically significant cost decrease, and a cost-offset point around the 4th post-initiation month.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sun et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=18,269). Valsartan vs. Pre-initiation period / forecasted costs without initiation was evaluated on Monthly medical costs (p=<0.01). Valsartan initiation in hypertensive patients reversed a $10 monthly increase in medical costs to a $6 monthly decrease (p<0.01), achieving a cost-offset point by the 4th post-initiation month.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17892e0a2f3f8e141296f2https://doi.org/10.3111/13696998.2011.626097
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Economic impact of switching from valsartan to other angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with hypertension2010 · 14 citations
  2. 2Comparison of real-world adherence, healthcare resource utilization and costs for newly initiated valsartan/amlodipine single-pill combination versus angiotensin receptor blocker/calcium channel blocker free-combination therapy2011 · 47 citations
  3. 3Sartans: differences, similitudes and costs2008
  4. 4Estimated cost savings associated with the use of valsartan in heart failure in a large US health plan2007 · 1 citations
  5. 5The Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation (VALUE) Trial2006 · 151 citations