PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 25, 2004173 citations

Sharp or smooth?

View Full Paper
JMJohn D. McCarthyMSM. Angela SasseDMDimitrios Miras

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We introduce a new methodology to evaluate the perceived quality of video with variable physical quality. The methodology is used to evaluate existing guidelines - that frame is more important than quantization when watching motion video, such as sports coverage. We test this claim in two studies that examine the relationship between these physical quality metrics and perceived quality. In Study 1, 41 soccer fans viewed CIF-sized images on a desktop computer. Study 2 repeated the experiment with 37 soccer fans, viewing the same content, in QCIF size, on a palmtop device. Contrary to existing guidelines, we found that users prefer high-resolution images to frame rate. We conclude that the rule high motion = frame rate does not apply to small screens. With small screen devices, reducing quantization removes important information about the players and the ball. These findings have important implications for service providers and designers of streamed video applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McCarthy et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17a8330a2f3f8e1412b3fahttps://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985760
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper