PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 20260 citationsOpen Access

An Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Manufacturing in Nigeria's Industrial Sector

View Full Paper
GWGaoussou WagueMAMs. Anushka

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to evaluate the state of corporate social responsibility and sustainable manufacturing practices within Nigeria's industrial sector.
  • Data was collected from corporate sustainability reports and peer-reviewed articles from 2020 to 2024.
  • Benchmarking materials from GRI, Deloitte, PwC, and BlackRock were utilized in the analysis.
  • Engagement levels of multinational versus local firms were assessed quantitatively.
  • Multinational firms achieved an average CSR engagement score of 3.6 out of 5, compared to 2.4 for local firms.
  • Philanthropic approaches showed no significant correlation with performance metrics or Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
  • Strategic CSR practices contributed to approximately 41% of performance differences within the sector.

Abstract

This paper looks at corporate social responsibility and sustainable manufacturing in Nigerias industrial sector. It focuses on things like cement, steel, consumer goods, and agro industrial firms. From what I gathered, the data comes from corporate sustainability reports and some peer reviewed articles published between 2020 and 2024. There are also benchmarking materials from groups like GRI in 2023, Deloitte and PwC in 2024, and BlackRock in 2023. The evidence points to CSR in Nigeria mostly being reactive philanthropy instead of a real strategy. Firms tend to stick to one off community donations and just the bare minimum that regulators require. Transparency in ESG reporting feels pretty weak, and stakeholder engagement is not very deep. There is this clear divide between multinational firms and the local ones. Multinationals average about 3.6 out of 5 on CSR engagement, while indigenous firms are around 2.4. I think strategic CSR, especially in environmental management and employee welfare, explains roughly 41 percent of the performance differences seen in sector studies. Philanthropy only approaches do not seem to link to performance in any meaningful statistical way. On top of that, the paper pushes for mandatory ESG reporting that fits Nigerian conditions. It also suggests community led processes for designing CSR, and maybe a national strategy to tie corporate sustainability to the countrys development goals. That part gets a bit messy, since not everything is fully connected yet in the findings. Philanthropy keeps coming up as the main thing firms do, but it does not really move the needle on SDGs. Some people might see multinationals doing better because of their resources, others think local firms could catch up with the right support.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wague et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192e39fab5b468c44172fdhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20411336
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Corporate, Social Responsibility (CSR) in Nigeria: Investigating Discrepancy between Practices and Blind Spots2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Mediating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance on Performance: Evidence from Manufacturing Enterprises in Nigeria2025
  3. 3Corporate Sustainability Strategies and Performance of Manufacturing Firms: A Visionary Leadership among Industry Managers in Kano, Nigeria2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Effect Of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance on Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Nigeria2021
  5. 5Firm Characteristics, Corporate Governance, and Environmental Sustainability Disclosure in Manufacturing Firms in Nigeria (2014–2025)2026